Clear, Confusing, etc.

The clearest point that has been made to me in Mass Media Law and Ethics is that freedom of speech has been contested and will continue to be tested throughout history. It was very interesting to learn about the development of certain laws or acts that were created by our Government in times of war to censor the press and freedom of speech. It was equally as interesting to learn about how the press and society fought back in order to keep our democracy (and what that really means) intact.

One of the more confusing points in the course has been the determination of fact vs. law. I feel that sometimes I think too hard about what each part means specifically, whereas I should consider that, more often than not, the two will at some point begin to run together. Facts can lead to the application of a specific law or laws can be reworked or developed based on the facts. (At least, this is what I am getting out of it. See? It’s confusing!)

I would like to continue learning about the history behind the constitution and the different laws and court cases affecting freedom and speech and the press. (This is because I have a history minor with my elementary education degree. History has always been a passion of mine. To see where things began, where they went to, and where they could be headed. I like the Anthony Lewis book). I would also like to possibly discuss more current cases in the media like we have been doing.